theme: Colin Fall 2022 autoscale: true slidenumbers: true header: #373737, alignment(left), line-height(150%), text-scale(1.0), ITC Galliard Pro Bold Footer:

Factual Causation:

Multiple Defendants

Causation

Two parts:



Two different tests for factual causation




Causation

Two parts:

  1. Factual cause
  2. Proximate cause

Two different tests for factual causation

  1. “But for”
  2. Substantial factor

fit

Stubbs v. City of Rochester

Zuchowicz v. United States


[fit] What about multiple possible causes?


Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

“Multiple Fires Whodunnit”


Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

Necessary condition: Result happens ONLY IF condition exists. Put another way: IF NOT condition, then NO result.

Sufficient condition: IF condition exists, then result happens.

Summers v. Tice

“Hunting Party Whodunnit”


Summers v. Tice

Three reasons for alternative liability:

  1. Almost 51% probability
  2. Fairness
  3. “Smoke out” the real evidence

Summers v. Tice

Three reasons for alternative liability:

  1. Almost 51% probability
  2. Fairness
  3. “Smoke out” the real evidence

Garcia v. Joseph Vince Co.

“Fencing Sabre Whodunnit”

Colin Doyle
Colin Doyle
Associate Professor of Law