Workers’ Compensation

Schedule this week

Wednesday

Class - 8:00am - 9:40am - No Fault and Beyond

Office Hours - 12:00pm - 1:00pm

Thursday

Class - 10:10am - 11:50am - No Fault and Beyond / Review

Office Hours - 12:00pm - ???


Liability Insurance

  • How does it affect what cases are litigated?
  • How does it affect the consequences of liability?

Workers’ Compensation


Lamson v. American Axe & Tool Co.

“The Axe that Fell on the Employee”

The “Unholy Trinity” of Common Law Defenses

  1. Fellow servant rule
  2. Contributory negligence
  3. Assumption of risk

The Bargain of Workers’ Compensation

No fault

and

Exclusive remedy


Workers’ Compensation Requirements

Only compensates for work-related injuries

Benefits include:

—— Medical coverage

—— Percent of lost wages

—— Vocational rehabilitation

—— Survivor benefits

Employers must buy workers’ comp insurance


When would an employee not file a workers’ comp claim?

Injury wasn’t work-related

Injury resulted from employer’s intentional tort

Employee does not count as an employee


Revisiting Lamson v. American Axe

What does the plaintiff recover?

Tort LawWorkers Comp
Facts of actual case:
No assumption of risk:

Revisiting Lamson v. American Axe

What does the plaintiff recover?

Tort LawWorkers Comp
Facts of actual case:Nothing
No assumption of risk:Full recovery

Revisiting Lamson v. American Axe

What does the plaintiff recover?

Tort LawWorkers Comp
Facts of actual case:NothingPartial recovery
No assumption of risk:Full recoveryPartial recovery

Third-party claims

Rule: Employee can file a workers’ compensation claim against their employer but workers compensation’ does not cover third parties.

Hypothetical: Gladys Escola is a waitress. While serving a Coca-Cola beverage at work, the bottle explodes in her hand, injuring her hand. She needs surgery and will be unable to work for months.

What’s your legal advice for her?


Big Picture: Workers’ Comp vs. Tort Law

Deterrence

Compensation

Administrative Cost

Equity


Ideology


Does tort law have an ideology?


-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional Torts
Type of
Conduct
??????
???
???
Causal
Connection
???
???
???
???
???
???
Affirmative
Defenses
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
Damages
Available
?????????

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional Torts
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm
Causal
Connection
???
???
???
???
???
???
Affirmative
Defenses
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
Damages
Available
?????????

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional Torts
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm
Causal
connection
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
Affirmative
Defenses
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
Damages
Available
?????????

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional Torts
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm
Causal
connection
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
Affirmative
defenses
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Consent
- Self defense
- Necessity
Damages
Available
?????????

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional Torts
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm
Causal
connection
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
Affirmative
defenses
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Consent
- Self defense
- Necessity
Damages
available
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional TortsWorkers’ Comp
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm???
Causal
connection
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
???
Affirmative
defenses
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Consent
- Self defense
- Necessity
???
Damages
available
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
???

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional TortsWorkers’ Comp
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm- Workplace injuries
Causal
connection
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
???
Affirmative
defenses
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Consent
- Self defense
- Necessity
???
Damages
available
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
???

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional TortsWorkers’ Comp
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm- Workplace injuries
Causal
connection
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Injury must be “work-related”
Affirmative
defenses
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Consent
- Self defense
- Necessity
???
Damages
available
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
???

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional TortsWorkers’ Comp
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm- Workplace injuries
Causal
connection
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Injury must be “work-related”
Affirmative
defenses
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Consent
- Self defense
- Necessity
- Employee was outside “scope of employment”
Damages
available
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
???

-NegligenceStrict LiabilityIntentional TortsWorkers’ Comp
Type of
conduct
- Fault- Dangerous activities
- Products
- Intentional harm- Workplace injuries
Causal
connection
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Factual cause
- Proximate cause
- Injury must be “work-related”
Affirmative
defenses
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Comparative fault
- Assumption of risk
- Consent
- Self defense
- Necessity
- Employee was outside “scope of employment”
Damages
available
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Past and future damages (economic, noneconomic, punitive)
(lump sum payment)
- Unlimited medical compensation
- Fraction of lost wages (with statutory cap)
(paid in installments)